Learn Back End Development at These 60 Back End Development Bootcamps

I completed the online Back end bootcamp in May 2024, opting for the flexi option but I was still able to attend the weekly workshops (You just need to email them and ask if you are on the cheaper flexi-plan.) Overall: - It covers a lot of Back-End fundamentals, however to get fully job ready I'd say you will need to do a lot more than just completing the weekly lessons. Luckily they do provide you with a lot of extra documentation to build a more solid base. I'd also suggest to be constantly building your own projects to apply the skills in a more practical context. - The content is mainly videos or walkthrough exercises, so to make it more challenging I was completing the exercises alone and then just checking the guide if I struggled - The workshops are usually a review (with more practical examples) of the weeks' content, and then you complete an individual project. None of the workshops really did group projects, so I'd suggest contacting other classmembers to form private study groups etc (especially to learn about collaborative projects on GitHub like in a real job.) Course 1: Python Fundamentals: - This is a pretty basic introductory course on Python, and while it covers all the fundamentals it skips a few intermediate / advanced concepts (e.g. try / catch blocks, error handling etc.) Therefore make sure you cover all the extra material and if anything is "outside the scope of this course" make sure you research it if you want to work in Python. Course 2: SQL and Python - Covering PostgresSQL from beginner to fairly intermediate / advanced this was a more complete course, and the instructor Omar was really helpful / knowledgeable. The exercises in the workshops are more challenging and force you to actually learn and apply the concepts. - There are still certain advanced SQL concepts that are not covered, so again make sure you cover all the extra resources, and anything which is "out of scope" for the course. - This course covered flask pretty well, but again I'd suggest building your own Flask project from scratch in order to deepen your understanding. Course 3: Modern Software Engineering with DevOps - This course focused more on DevOps than actual coding, and included a lot of different areas (e.g. collaborative projects, advanced GitHub, testing your projects and Cloud deployment etc.) It felt very practical for a junior position, and the workshops were also really helpful. Travis the instructor provided real-life, applicable examples and was clearly very experienced in all the course areas. - The course used Django for web deployment but didn't really explain much about the inner workings of Django, so if you want to build advanced web apps with Python you'll need to do a lot of extra research on Django. - The main thing I didn't like about this course was that it covered all 3 Cloud Providers (AWS, Google Cloud, Azure,) covering 1 per week along with other concepts. Therefore it didn't really go into enough depth where I felt I could work with them just by the course content (only by deploying my own projects gave me more confidence with the platforms.) A lot of the exercises just told you what to do without fully explaining the why, so make sure you understand each step by doing your own research, don't just follow and copy / paste etc.

I had a fantastic experience completing the Springboard Software Engineering Bootcamp. The curriculum was comprehensive, hands-on, and up to date with current industry standards. I appreciated how the program balanced theory with real-world projects, allowing me to build a solid portfolio and gain practical experience in full-stack development. One of the biggest highlights was the personalized mentorship. My mentor provided invaluable guidance, consistent feedback, and support throughout the program, which made a huge difference in my learning journey. The career coaching sessions were also incredibly helpful in preparing for the job search, from resume reviews to mock interviews. Overall, Springboard gave me the skills and confidence to transition into tech, and I’m grateful for the structure, resources, and support it provided. I highly recommend it to anyone serious about breaking into software engineering.

This bootcamp was intense and challenging, but I successfully made it through to graduation. It is a great program not only for career switchers, but also for IT fresh graduates like me who want to strengthen their practical software engineering skills, especially in backend development. At first, I doubted that a short bootcamp could truly prepare me for real backend work. The experience was demanding—I faced many tricky bugs, spent late nights debugging, and had to keep up with a very dense and fast-paced curriculum. The instructors pushed us to solve problems properly instead of taking shortcuts, which helped me develop stronger technical problem-solving skills. Throughout the bootcamp, I learned how to build and run simple microservices, connect them to databases, and integrate APIs into real backend projects. If you want hands-on backend experience and are ready to handle pressure with determination, this bootcamp is a valuable way to gain practical, real-world skills.

The short version. I believe that this course is good for complete beginners but it is too expensive for the value you get. That's in regards to the knowledge you come out of the program with and your chances of breaking into an engineering role, particularly in this economy. If you are going to go through with the course, I highly recommend taking only 1 stack (i.e., language). They're extremely similar and it's not possible to become proficient in multiple languages during the course's timeframe. Honestly, my biggest regret in this course was taking more than 1 stack. The longer version. Background. A bit background on me for comparison sake if it helps with your decision making. I've worked a bunch of corporate jobs from finance to consulting. I'm good at excel but was a complete beginner at coding. I started learning how to code on my own about 4 months prior to enrolling into the bootcamp. I ultimately decided to enroll because I wanted to accelerate my learning with the thought that the bootcamp would significantly decrease the amount of time it took me to get a job. I came in knowing that bootcamps in general are not a golden ticket into a software development role, and that ultimately, you get out what you put in. Curriculum. I took two stacks, Python and MERN (Javascript). I definitely did learn a few things during the program. However, I was surprised to see a number of lessons in the curriculum were simply links to other sites. In fact, the very most I learned during the program was during the lesson on CSS and the curriculum was basically all links to lessons you could find for free, such as Flexbox Froggy. I do want to make it clear that you do learn the basics of programming from loops, data types and conditionals. You also come out of each stack being able to build a basic app, learning how to build the frontend, backend and connect the two. However, I knew most of the material already even though I had been learning how to code for 4 months prior, using free resources. There's definitely value of having structure and guidance (although Chat-GPT could fill that role) so if that's a reason why you want to join the program then that's a great decision too. Just please don't take more than 1 stack. I think MERN is the best because you learn react and that's a very popular frontend framework. The stacks are basically copies of each other and I didn't gain any additional value, but it was expensive. The bootcamp sells you on the importance of learning multiple languages but once you have the foundational knowledge of a language, it's all syntax from there. You're likely gonna forget the first stack's language nuances by the time you're done with the second stack anyways, and I think it's more important to show that you're proficient at coding through your projects. That becomes a lot easier when you stick to one language. Teachers and Teacher Assistants. The bootcamp has multiple lectures weekly and also provides TA support throughout the afternoon / evening. I found both the teachers and TA's to be very nice and knowledgable about the curriculum. They're former students, which is definitely helping the bootcamps employment numbers. There are moments where it's still clear that the teachers and TA's learned coding fairly recently. As I mentioned in the curriculum section, you get taught the basics and if you need help with that level of knowledge, then the support is great. Step a little outside of that boundary and you don't get much support. I visited the TA's about a number of times during the course with questions that were just a step or two deeper into what was being taught in the curriculum and I genuinely can't remember a time when they answered my question. One TA even explained that it's a skill to be able to find an answer by myself, which is true but I'm also paying over $12K for you to help guide me. Chat-GPT became popular during my time in this course and I can confidently say that it has been so much more helpful than Coding Dojo. Career Support. A big reason why I chose Coding Dojo was the lifetime career support. It sounds amazing and ultimately the reason why many people choose to join a bootcamp is to get a job. The people who you will work with are kind. I had a great experience interacting with them on a personal level, but they provided me with limited help. I didn't use all of their resources to be fair. I did use them for guidance on how to approach the job search, my resume, and review of my portfolio website. For guidance, it was very high level. For example, you should build out a portfolio website highlighting projects, get your resume together, and look at jobs on these sites. When I was talking to the sales rep, it seemed as if Coding Dojo had a lot more relationship or pipelines with companies looking to hire. However, at present there were no relationships like that. Part of that is the economy but it did not seem like there were many to begin with. For my resume and portfolio website, I just got a lot of praise or minor edits. If you come from a career path where you have experience writing a corporate resume then the career services in my opinion will not provide significant value. Especially if you also know where to look for jobs (BuiltIn, Wellfound, Y Combinator's website). These jobs aren't necessarily hard to find. However, if you're coming for less adjacent field then there is definitely value here. Conclusion. After going through a bootcamp, I understand all the comments about how bootcamp is not a golden ticket into a software development role. Yet, it can still be useful. The question is whether it is worth the cost. I say maybe, but only if it's for one stack. Also, I suggest part time if you can rather than full time because it's not going to be easy to break into engineering after this program. If you can be self-taught I would personally go that route, picking a project and then learning what it takes to build that project. In fact, that's exactly what I did and I've learned 5x more than I learned during the bootcamp. I even learned the most up-to-date popular technologies and frameworks, which the curriculum doesn't teach. Not that the curriculum is outdated, but it's also not completely up-to-date either.

Mentor-led thing is a scam, mentors offer no real help. They respond every 18-48 hours. The course content is crappy and absolutely terrible. I paid so much money for crap.

This course was great, making me confident that my web development capabilities were solid. I think I may have taken two or three courses on reactJS and still couldn't do much of anything with the technology. This course changed that for sure. To top everything off, the fundamentals course introduced me to 'typing' which changed everything for me. From the fundamentals to the specialty courses, this program is unmatched by anything on the market today, this statement is made even more true when you compare the CourseCareers price to the price of other software development programs. The low price of the learning material is nothing compared to the reward of building your own applications. I'll definitely be back for even more specialty training.

My experience with Actualize was amazing. The instruction was clear and hands-on, and my instructor was extremely knowledgeable, patient, and genuinely helpful. Classes felt like a mentorship more than a lecture; we worked through real problems, got constant feedback, and built projects that solidified what we learned. The program emphasizes problem-solving and practical skills, not just memorizing code, so I left feeling confident in my ability to tackle real-world development work. I would recommend Actualize to everyone, especially beginners and career-changers who want strong fundamentals and caring, experienced instructors.

As a former computer science student in college, Flatiron will teach you things I never learned, or even expected to learn, in a coding bootcamp. Upon graduating, I became even more impressed with the overall experience when using the career services. I felt incredibly lost leading up to graduation when thinking about the job hunt because I had no experience in the corporate world. I was not switching careers, but still pursuing my original one. I now feel fully equipped with knowing lots of corporate etiquette and certain formulas and procedures you just have to follow for things. There were a couple downsides, and I'm hoping one was due to a unique situation. I dealt with instructor roulette due to layoffs and curriculum restructuring. Even though I was on the FLEX self-paced path, not having a static instructor the entire time was rough. The other is lack of focus on algorithmic, typical coding questions you will see in tech interviews. There is a curriculum for that post-grad, but I would have liked to learn more and be tested on them during my education.

Bootcamp learning comes with a steep learning curve, but having the right mentor makes all the difference. Switching to work with coach Victoria Elisabeth was a complete game-changer for my TripleTen experience. While the curriculum provides a strong technical foundation, Victoria made the entire process so much less stressful. Her patient, empathetic coaching style allowed me to pace myself, digest the materials deeply, and gain true confidence in my skills. Huge thanks to Victoria for being such an understanding mentor throughout this journey!

Tech Elevator is a coding bootcamp that lends you the opportunity to hunker down and learn how to engineer a full stack web service, from scratch, in as little as 14 weeks! If you take it seriously, practice hard, ask lots of questions, and believe in yourself. You too can finish the program with the confidence you need to bash code from thought and enter the job market your chin held high. TE hosts a solid curriculum that allows even complete novices to quickly gain traction and jump into programming. The instructors are very knowledgeable and want you to succeed. Pathway is an excellent addition with university level instruction on how to enter the job market with your best foot forward. The bootcamp is very intense and fast paced. If you don’t feel comfortable asking for help when you don’t understand, you can find yourself behind the ball in an uncomfortable position.

Just finished the year-long software engineering residency at Coding Temple and I can't say enough good things about it. The program is the real deal. We worked on an actual production mobile app for an oil services company with real stakeholders, real deadlines, and a real team. By the end of the residency I had built out features touching React Native, Flask, Postgres, AI integration with Gemini and Claude, biometric authentication, GPS proximity verification, and offline-first sync. Nothing toy about any of it. Ellijah, Justin and Sara were a huge part of why this worked. As a teachers and mentors they were incredible support throughout the entire program. Patient with the harder concepts, sharp on code review feedback, and always available when something blocked the team. They treat students like teammates, which is exactly the energy you want when you're learning to work on real codebases. Highly recommend Coding Temple to anyone serious about transitioning into software engineering. The depth is there if you put in the work.

The coaches are skilled, caring and supportive. They get to know you and really care about your success and wellbeing. The course is very comprehensive and at times intense but not as intense as I was expecting. It was manageable and I learned so much in such a short space of time. I wouldn’t say I felt totally prepared for that first role as a software developer but that’s more because of many companies’ unrealistic expectations on Junior Developers (and maybe a little bit of a self-confidence issue, too - I was a teacher with zero coding experience before making the switch). If you put in the work, you can make that career switch with Makers. They came highly recommended to me and I saw why.

I want to sincerely thank Turing College for the Software and AI Engineering program. For me, this course was much more than just another online learning experience, it became an important turning point in my journey and gave me a real path toward a career change into tech. I am also especially grateful that I had the opportunity to study through a scholarship. Having access to such a strong program without financial pressure meant a lot to me. It gave me the chance to focus on learning, building, and improving myself, and I do not take that opportunity for granted. Before joining the program, I was learning coding by myself. I tried many different resources, followed tutorials, built small projects, and also worked with WordPress and page builders to create websites. That helped me understand the basics of building for the web, but I often felt that something deeper was missing. I could create pages, but when I needed custom logic, specific features, backend functionality, or a stronger understanding of how real software systems work, I realized that I needed a more serious foundation. At the same time, I was thinking a lot about the future of programming. AI was changing the software industry very quickly, and I did not want to become someone who only knows surface-level tools. I wanted to find a real path into the programming field, become competitive in the job market, take my first steps toward a junior developer role, and build the kind of knowledge that could help me grow into a strong professional over the next 5–10 years. That is one of the biggest reasons this course was so important for me. It did not make me feel afraid of AI replacing developers, it helped me understand how to work with AI, how to build with it, and how to think like a modern software and AI engineer. Instead of only trying to catch up with the industry, I started to feel that I could adapt to where the industry is going and build the skills needed to become more advanced, confident, and future-ready. The Software and AI Engineering course helped me move from self-study and surface-level coding into a much more structured and professional way of thinking. I started to understand not only how to write code, but why code is written in a certain way, how to solve problems step by step, how to think about architecture, and how frontend, backend, data, and AI systems connect together. The learning path was challenging, but also very motivating. I started with Python programming, logic-based tasks, chess logic, and automated reports, and then gradually moved into full-stack development and more advanced AI engineering topics. I worked with concepts such as LLM applications, LangChain, LangGraph, RAG, ChromaDB, AI agents, deep learning, and NLP. Every sprint gave me a new perspective and helped me build confidence. One of the strongest parts of the program was that it was not only theoretical. The course pushed me to build hands-on projects and create a real portfolio. My capstone project, SearchTour, became one of the most meaningful parts of my learning journey. Seeing it included as a Turing College showcase project alongside other strong student work was a very proud moment for me. It showed me how far I had come and proved that I could design and build a real AI-powered product idea using modern software engineering and AI engineering concepts. I also want to especially mention the reviews, feedback, STLs, JTLs, lecturers, organizers, managers, and everyone involved in the program. The feedback was not only technical, but also motivating. It helped me understand my weak points, improve my thinking, and see how professionals from the field approach real software problems. Many times, their comments and advice gave me extra motivation to continue when something felt difficult. What I really appreciated about Turing College is that the program does not simply give you information. It pushes you to build, think, explain your decisions, improve your work, and become more independent. That kind of learning is very valuable, especially for someone like me who came from self-study and wanted to become more serious and professional in software engineering, full-stack development, and AI development. This course changed my life in a very positive way. It gave me motivation, structure, confidence, and a much clearer direction. I now understand code and AI engineering much better than before, and I feel more prepared to continue growing as a developer. I highly recommend Turing College and the Software and AI Engineering program to anyone who is serious about learning modern software development, Python programming, AI engineering, and building practical real-world projects. It is not always easy, but it is absolutely worth it. If you are motivated, curious, and ready to build, this program can give you the structure, support, mentorship, and professional guidance you need. Thank you to Turing College and everyone who was part of this journey. I am proud that I completed it, grateful for the scholarship opportunity, and thankful for everything I learned.

I would recommend DigitalCrafts to anyone that is committed to transitioning into full-stack software development. During the 17-week full-time program I experienced tremendous growth and was able to build much greater things than I expected. On the 17th week I was accepted into an internship and it's because of this bootcamp. During the full-time bootcamp it is up to you and how hard you are willing to apply yourself during this time. If you need to recharge, recharge. However, if you have free time, commit it to learning new technologies or improving existing skills. As I write this, I am now familiarizing myself with an entirely new codebase and beginning work with 40 other developers. The curriculum keeps you moving and lays an important foundation for new developers. Also, I would recommend Veronica as an instructor. If you're willing to work hard and you aren't just trying to "get by" - this bootcamp will be great for you.

LearningFuze Bootcamp exceeded my expectations by providing all the tools I needed to create polished, full-stack applications. The curriculum focused on the PERN stack, with particular emphasis on React, which is valuable for building modern applications. They prepared us with everything from front-end basics to back-end development, ensuring a well-rounded understanding of full-stack concepts. The support from instructors and staff was consistently available and helpful. Whether I needed help with coding challenges or career advice, there was always someone ready to assist. Speaking of career preparation, LearningFuze put a strong emphasis on job readiness, which included mock interviews, resume support, and guidance on building a portfolio. They really did prepared us for the job hunt, even though the current market is tough for new developers. We were able to build two solid portfolio projects—a front-end project and a full-stack application—that demonstrates our skills to potential employers. Overall, I would recommend LearningFuze to anyone looking to transition into tech or strengthen their coding skills. The bootcamp is perfect for people who want a comprehensive, career-oriented program with lots of support.

Joining this Full Stack Web Development bootcamp was one of the best learning experiences I've had. The curriculum was well-structured, starting from the fundamentals and progressing to real-world projects. The mentors were supportive, patient, and always willing to answer questions in detail. I also appreciated the hands-on assignments, code reviews, and collaborative environment that helped me improve both my technical and problem-solving skills. By the end of the bootcamp, I felt much more confident building full-stack applications and preparing for a career in software development. I highly recommend this bootcamp to anyone who wants practical experience and guidance from experienced mentors.

I managed to achieve really fast results. While it can be intense at times, this helps me discover my maximum potential and have to give my best. The assistance from instructors is really good. I also appreciate how it prepares you for real-world working environments. Highly recommended.

True Coders has Jumped Started this 57 year old brain! From admission staff which in my case was Cruz Sanchez. He was encouraging and helpful thru the process. My instructor Hunter Anderson was the best at explaining everything. Bootcamp is designed to be pretty fast. So having a instructor that is easy to understand is vital. So Hunter explained very well and was easy for me to grasp it. They also have other instructors as well that you can reach out to. I have met with Tyson Lind who wasn't my instructor but he is not only a very knowledgeable and was very happy to help with my questions. They also have career services that Andrea Schwenk leads. She teaches you how and what is going to happen in interviews. She also teaches you how to make you resume as a web developer. I was and am very pleased and impressed on how personable everyone was. They genuinely care for your success.. I would recommend this bootcamp!

The Bootcamp is an excellent place to start if you're a beginner looking for a comprehensive and well-structured introduction to full-stack web development. It's a very intense 3 months of learning with daily practice and some team projects. The instructors and assistants are always available and helpful. From the first call until after the end of the BootCamp, the whole team is committed to helping you achieve your goals.

The Bridge’s Full Stack Online Bootcamp was a challenging and rewarding experience that transformed my career. The instructors, Data and Reyes, are amazing; they don’t just teach — they stand by you, even through moments of breakdown, offering guidance and encouragement. The curriculum, hands-on projects, and supportive community prepared me for real-world development. Shortly after graduating, I joined The Bridge as a Teacher Assistant, continuing to learn while helping others grow. Highly recommended for anyone serious about entering the tech industry.

The course is good, the instructors are extremely nice, responsive and helpful, BUT the course is ALLLLLL over the place. examples are extremely confusing (seem totally misplaced or irrelevant) and include things you haven't even learned yet in the example code, which makes it way more confusing. I found there was no flow of content its here and there then going back then too far forward and its overall an extremely hard course due to this reason.

I was emailed directly and asked to apply. I took my time and asked lots of questions, I researched online and found very few reviews. Should have been my first red flag. I've since learned all negative reviews of this school are deleted not long after being posted. I've can only guess from my own experience why this would be. First of all, they were very fast moving, fast talking, and car salesman like in how they push you to meet fast approaching deadlines to sign everything and jump in. Also should have been a red flag. I initially stated I already had student loans I could not afford and did not want to take on more debt. I was told about a couple scholarships. I applied and won a 50% scholarship. I asked about additional scholarships and was advised about an Income Share Agreement. I had never heard of this before. I was told it was very safe and not a student loan because if I did not earn $65,000 a year for 5 years after certification the debt would be waived entirely, and if I did earn $65,000 a year I would owe them $7,500 repaid at 9% of my monthly income. I was promised job assistance in the form of job placement and resume and interview review and prep. I was told the entry level positions I could expect to get within 6 months of graduating was $100,000 a year or more. None of this was true. Again I was heavily pressured to get thing signed, software installed, permissions and access to my computers provided within a very short amount of time to meet their "deadlines". The reality is that they start these courses every couple weeks and they are almost entirely AI run through prerecorded slides, free links to other code teaching platforms, and YouTube videos. So there was no need to be pressured to meet these fast approaching deadlines because more classes start constantly. This was a tactic to rush through any and all fine print and questionable permissions and software. The entire staff at the time I came on board were self admitted hackers. They would begin exposing this through the course. There are 2 teachers for each course. A main teacher and an asst. teacher who would teach alternate supplemental classes sometimes related to the topic at hand and other times not related at all. Many times that instructor was expected to cover topics with us that had not been covered yet by the main instructor causing the class to be very confused and unable to follow along because that material had not been covered yet. It would be like learning multiplication for 3 weeks with the main instructor and then having the asst on Wednesday show up with a class assignment on Calculus. The literal example is we were learning HTML and CSS and then given an assignment on React. We then spent multiple weeks learning JavaScript to then get an assignment in Java. Every class was a slideshow with links to YouTube videos or links and assignments on other free platforms like freecodecamp and codeacademy and w3schools. The class is 3 hours long. We were originally told 4 days a week with Wed optional. When class started the instructor informed us Wed was mandatory as it was a different topic and curriculum from the main instructor and attendance would count for missed days. The instructor for the main course read the slideshows word for word for 3 hours straight. If we asked questions or asked for help with something we were told to "Google it" or ask chat gpt. We were told by both instructors that they were paid for the 3 hours of lecture time and the slides had to be covered so there was no time for questions or reviewing. Assignments were graded several weeks after completing with only 100% or 0% as completed or not completed. So there was no feedback or instruction on what was right or wrong. When I brought this up my next assignment was to code something intentionally incorrect so you could see the errors that vscode would present. I did exactly that and was graded a low grade due to errors. (This was the only grade the entire course that was not graded based solely on completed or not.) When I tried to address the feedback with the instructor privately he repeatedly ignored what I was saying until I put it in the class chat. He then changed the grade to 100% and privately in the feedback said it was a well deserved 100% after out loud verbally in front of the class repeatedly saying I was wrong because of all the obvious errors. It seemed like my instructions were different then the rest of the class. It felt like retaliation for complaining in the form of public humiliation in front of the class. Many of the slides contained errors or were covering outdated material or non-working links. Several of the advertised topics were never covered at all during the course. When I was still in the enrollment process and trying to make sure I could commit to the requirements I asked what the time commitment was outside of lecture time to complete readings and assignments. I was told 1-2 hours per night. The reality is they shortened the original course which was a year or more to 12 weeks. So the curriculum was reduced down to 12 weeks. Some days the assignments alone due the following day were upwards of 6+ hours of independent study time. This resulted in many students no longer completing assignments or getting very far behind. Many students complained and the due dates were changed so that the assignments were due 7 days from the date they were assigned. This gave us more time to complete lessons and assignments but resulted in no feedback. It also made learning things in steps impossible. Imagine being taught how to make cheesecake. The first lesson on day 1 is how to purchase and operate a springform pan. You attempt to do so, get the pan but can't make it work. Day 2 you ask for help and are told to google it. While being taught how to gather ingredients needed and mix the cheesecake. So you get a bowl mix ingredients. Yours doesn't look like the teachers but you followed the printed steps. The teacher only completed 2 of 6 steps on screen so you have no idea how to work your pan and your cheesecake looks weird but no one wants to explain where you are going wrong. So you stay up all night watching youtubes, googling, chat gpting, you get the cheesecake right but can't figure out the pan still. Nothing has been graded, no feedback on assignments. Day 3 different teacher different topic, short YouTube then assignment: create a castle out of homemade rock crystals...(it's due next day 3 with no contact between with instructor) now.. Day 4 present your baked cheesecake with topping of choice. (The instructor will lecture on completely different topics while you do this so choose pay attention to what he's saying or work on your assignment). Maybe it's just me but I don't see how anyone could be successful learning like that. By the end of the course one student was able to transfer to a different instructor and never heard from him again, the rest of us tried to figure things out either between us or alone and many didn't get their certs. All complained they did not learn the material needed for employment, and at least 2 of us cried in class so...As if that wasn't bad enough when higher ups were reached out to their response was to bad mouth the instructors and make excuses for the big changes in curriculum going on. If your curriculum is going through an overhaul, why charge students to attend your broken classes? None of us were placed. None of us received real job offers as a result of this course. I was immediately approached by someone claiming to be an IRS recruiter after completing the course and it seemed like they referred me, however I used to work for IRS and many of the things she asked for raised red flags that she was not in fact employed by IRS. When I questioned this I was told she was a third party recruiter. She wanted me to contact my former superviser and get a copy of my security clearance and send it to her to which I blocked her and refused as highly suspicious with all the govt hacking happening. Later I saw many news stories about big hacking events that utilized things we completed for assignments and it made me further question who was involved with this business and what was really happening. All of the staff with the exception of the CEO and her right hand gal have resigned including their legal counsel from what their staff said. The only contact I received in the 14 months since completing the course were solicitations to purchase more courses or supplemental lessons. I believe this is a pay to play and the only job you will be offered is in office position making you now involved in the scheme. I filed a complaint with the BBB after getting little to no response from their company or representatives. The ISA I was rushed into was nothing they presented it to be. While my financial obligation should have been $7500 paid back or waived in 5 years, these are the actual terms: If I make more than $65,000 in a year and this is based on my monthly income. So if I make more than $5416 gross in a month they deem me at 65,000 a year for that month and 9% of my monthly income goes to them even if my normal monthly income is $2500. If I don't make $65,000 to their calculations that month does not count at all. They place me in deferment and it is not counted towards the 5 years at all. The only way the debt will be waived is if I make less than $5416 gross in a month for the next 10 years. If I do make over $65,000 the clock starts then. They get 9% of what ever I make not until the original $7500 is paid back as you would expect when told its zero interest at sign up. No they get 9% until more than twice that is paid back. So for a 12 week course that taught us fragments of Full Stack Web Development, did not offer job prep or placement, they got $7500 from whatever company sponsored my scholarship plus $16,000 when and if I ever teach myself how to make that income. For a company that's claim to fame is women owned, I am a single mom with 2 kids, a medical disability, and DVSA survivor. Through my many attempts to give them the benefit of the doubt and make this right all I've gotten is the run around and silence. Please stay away from predatory companies like this one.